Commit graph

11 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Claude
63bfed949e fix: feat: architect should pitch up to 3 sprints per run when multiple vision issues exist (#451)
Some checks failed
ci/woodpecker/push/ci Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/ci Pipeline failed
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-08 21:21:00 +00:00
Claude
3a9b42bca3 fix: architect should label filed sub-issues as backlog and mark vision issue as in-progress (#441)
All checks were successful
ci/woodpecker/push/ci Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/ci Pipeline was successful
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-08 20:21:26 +00:00
Agent
25433eaf67 fix: fix: architect should resume session when processing answers on an accepted sprint PR (#436)
All checks were successful
ci/woodpecker/push/ci Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/ci Pipeline was successful
When the architect processes human answers to design questions (answer_parsing step),
it now resumes the session from the research/questions run instead of starting fresh.
This preserves Claude's deep codebase understanding from the research phase, ensuring
sub-issues include specific file references and implementation details.

Changes:
- architect-run.sh: Added detect_questions_phase() to check if PR is in questions phase
  (has `## Design forks` section and question comments). If so, resume the session
  from SID_FILE to preserve context.
- formulas/run-architect.toml: Documented session resumption behavior in answer_parsing step.

Session is only preserved when PR is in questions-awaiting-answers phase. Fresh sessions
are started for new pitches (no stale context from old sprints).
2026-04-08 19:37:36 +00:00
6e9bb5348c Merge pull request 'fix: fix: architect should detect Forgejo PR review approvals, not just ACCEPT comments (#432)' (#435) from fix/issue-432 into main
All checks were successful
ci/woodpecker/push/ci Pipeline was successful
2026-04-08 19:13:10 +00:00
Claude
81b89259c3 fix: architect should detect Forgejo PR review approvals, not just ACCEPT comments (#432)
All checks were successful
ci/woodpecker/push/ci Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/ci Pipeline was successful
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-08 19:02:55 +00:00
Agent
0c68421e6f fix: fix: architect creates sprint PR with raw JSON body instead of formatted markdown (#431)
All checks were successful
ci/woodpecker/push/ci Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/ci Pipeline was successful
2026-04-08 18:54:40 +00:00
Agent
d315c79866 fix: correct Forgejo API references for merge and comments
All checks were successful
ci/woodpecker/push/ci Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/ci Pipeline was successful
2026-04-01 11:08:37 +00:00
Agent
3aca03a06b fix: feat(96d): architect formula — answer parsing + sub-issue filing (#102)
All checks were successful
ci/woodpecker/push/ci Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/ci Pipeline was successful
2026-04-01 10:57:26 +00:00
Agent
7134752525 fix: feat(96c): architect formula — sprint PR creation with questions (#101)
All checks were successful
ci/woodpecker/push/ci Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/ci Pipeline was successful
2026-04-01 10:50:06 +00:00
Agent
171b9d2ae3 fix: feat(96b): architect formula — research + design fork identification (#100)
All checks were successful
ci/woodpecker/push/ci Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/ci Pipeline was successful
2026-04-01 10:22:54 +00:00
Agent
564e2e774d fix: feat(96a): architect-bot user + directory + run script scaffold (#99)
Some checks failed
ci/woodpecker/push/ci Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/ci Pipeline failed
2026-04-01 09:53:47 +00:00