|
|
|
@ -1,42 +1,22 @@
|
|
|
|
[
|
|
|
|
[
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
"action": "edit_body",
|
|
|
|
"action": "edit_body",
|
|
|
|
"issue": 737,
|
|
|
|
"issue": 710,
|
|
|
|
"body": "Flagged by AI reviewer in PR #736.\n\n## Problem\n\n`close_vision_issue()` posts a completion comment and then closes the issue in two separate API calls. The close calls (lines 587-597 of `architect/architect-run.sh`) both use `|| true`, so a failed `state=closed` PATCH is silently ignored.\n\nThe idempotency guard added in PR #736 checks for the completion comment before proceeding. If the comment was posted successfully in a prior run but the close PATCH failed, the guard will now return 0 on all subsequent runs without retrying the close — the vision issue stays open indefinitely with a misleading \"Vision Issue Completed\" comment.\n\n## Fix\n\nAfter posting the comment, verify the issue is actually closed (check `.state` in the PATCH response or re-fetch). If the close fails, return 1 so the next polling cycle retries. The idempotency guard should also verify the issue state, not just the comment presence.\n\n---\n*Auto-created from AI review*\n\n## Acceptance criteria\n\n- [ ] After posting the completion comment, `close_vision_issue()` verifies `.state == \"closed\"` in the PATCH response or re-fetches the issue; if close fails, returns 1\n- [ ] The idempotency guard checks both comment presence AND `.state == \"closed\"` before returning 0; if the comment exists but the issue is still open, attempts the close again\n- [ ] Running `close_vision_issue` twice on a stuck-open issue (comment posted but state still open) retries the close and does not post a duplicate comment\n\n## Affected files\n\n- `architect/architect-run.sh` — `close_vision_issue()` function (~lines 527-600)\n"
|
|
|
|
"body": "## Goal\n\nDecide and implement a conversation history persistence model for `disinto-chat`. MVP target: append-only per-user NDJSON files on a bind-mounted host volume, one file per conversation, with a simple history list endpoint and sidebar in the UI.\n\n## Why\n\n- Without history, every page refresh loses context. Claude is stateless per invocation; the chat UI is what makes it feel like a conversation.\n- A full database with search is overkill for a personal / small-team factory (#623 security posture). Flat files are enough and recoverable by `cat`.\n\n## Scope\n\n### Files to touch\n\n- `lib/generators.sh` chat service:\n - Add a writable bind mount `${CHAT_HISTORY_DIR:-./state/chat-history}:/var/lib/chat/history` (one per-project host path; compose already pins the project root).\n - Must coexist with #706's read-only rootfs (this is a separate mount, not part of rootfs — sanity-check the sandbox verify script still passes).\n- `docker/chat/server.{py,go}`:\n - On each `POST /chat`, append one NDJSON line `{ts, user, role, content}` to `/var/lib/chat/history/<user>/<conversation_id>.ndjson`.\n - `GET /chat/history` → returns the list of conversation ids and first-message previews for the logged-in user.\n - `GET /chat/history/<id>` → returns the full conversation for the logged-in user; 404 if the file belongs to another user.\n - New conversation: `POST /chat/new` → generates a fresh conversation_id (random 12-char hex) and returns it.\n - UI: sidebar with conversation list, \"new chat\" button, load history into the log on click.\n- File naming: `<user>/<conversation_id>.ndjson` — user-scoped directory prevents cross-user leakage even if a bug leaks ids. `conversation_id` must match `^[0-9a-f]{12}$`, no slashes allowed.\n\n### Out of scope\n\n- Full-text search.\n- Database / SQLite.\n- History retention / rotation — unbounded for now.\n\n### In scope explicitly\n\n- Replaying prior turns back into the `claude --print` subprocess for follow-up turns: the backend must feed the prior NDJSON lines back into claude via whatever convention the agent code uses. Cross-check `docker/agents/entrypoint.sh` for how agents pass conversation state.\n\n## Acceptance\n\n- [ ] Sending 3 messages, refreshing the page, and clicking the conversation in the sidebar re-loads all 3 messages.\n- [ ] A new conversation starts with an empty context and does not see prior messages.\n- [ ] `ls state/chat-history/disinto-admin/` on the host shows one NDJSON file per conversation, each line is valid JSON.\n- [ ] A second user logging in via the #708 allowlist sees only their own conversations.\n- [ ] History endpoints are blocked for unauthenticated requests (inherits #708 / #709 auth).\n\n## Depends on\n\n- #705 (chat scaffold).\n\n## Notes\n\n- NDJSON, not JSON-array: append is O(1) and partial writes never corrupt prior lines. Mirrors the factory's CI log format at `lib/ci-log-reader.py`.\n- Per-user directory, not a single shared dir — path traversal via a crafted `conversation_id` is the main risk. The strict regex above is the mitigation.\n\n## Boundaries for dev-agent\n\n- Do not add SQLite, Postgres, or any database. Files.\n- Do not invent a conversation replay system. Whatever `claude --print` / the agents already do for context is the baseline — match it.\n- Do not store history inside the container's tmpfs — it has to survive container restarts.\n- Parent vision: #623.\n\n## Affected files\n- `lib/generators.sh` — chat service bind mount CHAT_HISTORY_DIR:/var/lib/chat/history\n- `docker/chat/server.{py,go}` — NDJSON append on POST /chat; GET /chat/history; GET /chat/history/<id>; POST /chat/new"
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
"action": "add_label",
|
|
|
|
"action": "edit_body",
|
|
|
|
"issue": 737,
|
|
|
|
"issue": 711,
|
|
|
|
"label": "backlog"
|
|
|
|
"body": "## Goal\n\nAdd per-user cost and request caps to `disinto-chat` so a compromised session (or a wedged browser tab firing requests in a loop) cannot run up an unbounded Anthropic bill or starve the agents' token budget.\n\n## Why\n\n- #623 \"Open questions\" explicitly calls this out. Chat is the only user-facing surface that spawns Claude on demand; no other factory surface does.\n- Cheap to enforce (counter + bash-style dict), expensive to forget.\n\n## Scope\n\n### Files to touch\n\n- `docker/chat/server.{py,go}`:\n - Per-user sliding-window request counter: `CHAT_MAX_REQUESTS_PER_HOUR` (default `60`), `CHAT_MAX_REQUESTS_PER_DAY` (default `500`).\n - Per-user token-cost counter: after each `claude --print`, parse the final `usage` event from `--output-format stream-json` if present; track cumulative tokens per day; reject if over `CHAT_MAX_TOKENS_PER_DAY` (default `1000000`).\n - Counters stored in-memory; reset on container restart (acceptable for MVP; file-based persistence is a follow-up).\n - Rejection response: 429 with `Retry-After` header and a friendly HTMX fragment explaining which cap was hit.\n- `lib/generators.sh` chat env: expose the three caps as overridable env vars with sane defaults baked in.\n\n### Out of scope\n\n- Billing dashboard.\n- Cross-container token budget coordination with the agents.\n- Cost tracking via Anthropic's billing API (not stable enough to depend on).\n\n## Acceptance\n\n- [ ] Sending 61 requests in an hour trips the hourly cap and returns 429 with `Retry-After: <seconds>`.\n- [ ] A single large completion that pushes daily tokens over the cap blocks the *next* request, not the current one (atomic check-then-consume is OK to skip for MVP).\n- [ ] Resetting the container clears counters (verified manually).\n- [ ] Caps are configurable via `.env` without rebuilding the image.\n\n## Depends on\n\n- #705 (chat scaffold).\n\n## Notes\n\n- Token accounting from `claude --print`: the stream-json mode emits a final `usage` event. If that event is absent or its format changes, fall back to a coarse request count only — do not block the user on parsing failures.\n- `Retry-After` must be an integer seconds value, not an HTTP-date, for HTMX to handle it cleanly client-side.\n\n## Boundaries for dev-agent\n\n- Do not add a rate-limiting library. A dict + timestamp list is sufficient for three counters.\n- Do not persist counters to disk this chunk. In-memory is the contract.\n- Do not block requests on Anthropic's own rate limiter. That is retried by `claude` itself; this layer is about *cost*, not throttling.\n- Parent vision: #623.\n\n## Affected files\n- `docker/chat/server.{py,go}` — per-user sliding-window request counter and token-cost counter; 429 rejection with Retry-After header\n- `lib/generators.sh` — chat env: CHAT_MAX_REQUESTS_PER_HOUR, CHAT_MAX_REQUESTS_PER_DAY, CHAT_MAX_TOKENS_PER_DAY"
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
"action": "edit_body",
|
|
|
|
"action": "edit_body",
|
|
|
|
"issue": 712,
|
|
|
|
"issue": 712,
|
|
|
|
"body": "## Goal\n\nLet `disinto-chat` perform scoped write actions against the factory — specifically: trigger a Woodpecker CI run, create a Forgejo issue, create a Forgejo PR — via explicit backend endpoints. The UI surfaces these as buttons the user clicks from a chat turn that proposes an action. The model never holds API tokens directly.\n\n## Why\n\n- #623 lists these escalations as the difference between \"chat that talks about the project\" and \"chat that moves the project forward\".\n- Routing through explicit backend endpoints (instead of giving the sandboxed claude process API tokens) keeps the trust model tight: the *user* authorises each action, not the model.\n\n## Scope\n\n### Files to touch\n\n- `docker/chat/server.{py,go}` — new authenticated endpoints (reuse #708 / #709 session check):\n - `POST /chat/action/ci-run` — body `{repo, branch}` → calls Woodpecker API with `WOODPECKER_TOKEN` (already in `.env` from existing factory setup) to trigger a pipeline.\n - `POST /chat/action/issue-create` — body `{title, body, labels}` → calls Forgejo API `/repos/<owner>/<repo>/issues` with `FORGE_TOKEN`.\n - `POST /chat/action/pr-create` — body `{head, base, title, body}` → calls `/repos/<owner>/<repo>/pulls`.\n - All actions record to #710's NDJSON history as `{role: \"action\", ...}` lines.\n- `docker/chat/ui/index.html` — small HTMX pattern: when claude's response contains a marker like `<action type=\"issue-create\">{...}</action>`, render a clickable button below the message; clicking POSTs to `/chat/action/<type>` with the payload.\n- `lib/generators.sh` chat env: pass `WOODPECKER_TOKEN`, `FORGE_TOKEN`, `FORGE_URL`, `FORGE_OWNER`, `FORGE_REPO`.\n\n### Out of scope\n\n- Destructive actions (branch delete, force push, secret rotation) — deliberately excluded.\n- Multi-step workflows / approval chains.\n- Arbitrary code execution in the chat container (that is what the agents exist for).\n\n## Acceptance\n\n- [ ] A chat turn that emits an `<action type=\"issue-create\">{...}</action>` block renders a button; clicking it creates an issue on Forgejo, visible via the API.\n- [ ] CI-trigger action creates a Woodpecker pipeline that can be seen in the CI UI.\n- [ ] PR-create action produces a Forgejo PR with the specified head / base.\n- [ ] All three actions are logged into the #710 history file with role `action` and the response from the API call.\n- [ ] Unauthenticated requests to `/chat/action/*` return 401 (inherits #708 gate).\n\n## Depends on\n\n- #708 (OAuth gate — actions are authorised by the logged-in user).\n- #710 (history — actions need to be logged alongside chat turns).\n\n## Notes\n\n- Forgejo API auth: the factory's `FORGE_TOKEN` is a long-lived admin token. For MVP, reuse it; a follow-up issue can scope it down to per-user Forgejo tokens derived from the OAuth flow.\n- Woodpecker API is at `http://woodpecker:8000/api/...`, reachable via the compose network — no need to go through the edge container.\n- The `<action>` marker is deliberately simple markup the model can emit in its response text. Do not implement tool-calling protocol; do not spin up an MCP server.\n\n## Boundaries for dev-agent\n\n- Do not give the claude subprocess direct API tokens. The chat backend holds them; the model only emits action markers the user clicks.\n- Do not add destructive actions (delete, force-push). Additive only.\n- Do not invent a new markup format beyond `<action type=\"...\">{JSON}</action>`.\n- Parent vision: #623.\n\n## Affected files\n\n- `docker/chat/server.py` (or `server.go`) — new `/chat/action/ci-run`, `/chat/action/issue-create`, `/chat/action/pr-create` endpoints\n- `docker/chat/ui/index.html` — action button rendering from `<action type=\"...\">{...}</action>` markers\n- `lib/generators.sh` — chat service env block: pass `WOODPECKER_TOKEN`, `FORGE_TOKEN`, `FORGE_URL`, `FORGE_OWNER`, `FORGE_REPO`\n"
|
|
|
|
"body": "## Goal\n\nLet `disinto-chat` perform scoped write actions against the factory — specifically: trigger a Woodpecker CI run, create a Forgejo issue, create a Forgejo PR — via explicit backend endpoints. The UI surfaces these as buttons the user clicks from a chat turn that proposes an action. The model never holds API tokens directly.\n\n## Why\n\n- #623 lists these escalations as the difference between \"chat that talks about the project\" and \"chat that moves the project forward\".\n- Routing through explicit backend endpoints (instead of giving the sandboxed claude process API tokens) keeps the trust model tight: the *user* authorises each action, not the model.\n\n## Scope\n\n### Files to touch\n\n- `docker/chat/server.{py,go}` — new authenticated endpoints (reuse #708 / #709 session check):\n - `POST /chat/action/ci-run` — body `{repo, branch}` → calls Woodpecker API with `WOODPECKER_TOKEN` (already in `.env` from existing factory setup) to trigger a pipeline.\n - `POST /chat/action/issue-create` — body `{title, body, labels}` → calls Forgejo API `/repos/<owner>/<repo>/issues` with `FORGE_TOKEN`.\n - `POST /chat/action/pr-create` — body `{head, base, title, body}` → calls `/repos/<owner>/<repo>/pulls`.\n - All actions record to #710's NDJSON history as `{role: \"action\", ...}` lines.\n- `docker/chat/ui/index.html` — small HTMX pattern: when claude's response contains a marker like `<action type=\"issue-create\">{...}</action>`, render a clickable button below the message; clicking POSTs to `/chat/action/<type>` with the payload.\n- `lib/generators.sh` chat env: pass `WOODPECKER_TOKEN`, `FORGE_TOKEN`, `FORGE_URL`, `FORGE_OWNER`, `FORGE_REPO`.\n\n### Out of scope\n\n- Destructive actions (branch delete, force push, secret rotation) — deliberately excluded.\n- Multi-step workflows / approval chains.\n- Arbitrary code execution in the chat container (that is what the agents exist for).\n\n## Acceptance\n\n- [ ] A chat turn that emits an `<action type=\"issue-create\">{...}</action>` block renders a button; clicking it creates an issue on Forgejo, visible via the API.\n- [ ] CI-trigger action creates a Woodpecker pipeline that can be seen in the CI UI.\n- [ ] PR-create action produces a Forgejo PR with the specified head / base.\n- [ ] All three actions are logged into the #710 history file with role `action` and the response from the API call.\n- [ ] Unauthenticated requests to `/chat/action/*` return 401 (inherits #708 gate).\n\n## Depends on\n\n- #708 (OAuth gate — actions are authorised by the logged-in user).\n- #710 (history — actions need to be logged alongside chat turns).\n\n## Notes\n\n- Forgejo API auth: the factory's `FORGE_TOKEN` is a long-lived admin token. For MVP, reuse it; a follow-up issue can scope it down to per-user Forgejo tokens derived from the OAuth flow.\n- Woodpecker API is at `http://woodpecker:8000/api/...`, reachable via the compose network — no need to go through the edge container.\n- The `<action>` marker is deliberately simple markup the model can emit in its response text. Do not implement tool-calling protocol; do not spin up an MCP server.\n\n## Boundaries for dev-agent\n\n- Do not give the claude subprocess direct API tokens. The chat backend holds them; the model only emits action markers the user clicks.\n- Do not add destructive actions (delete, force-push). Additive only.\n- Do not invent a new markup format beyond `<action type=\"...\">{JSON}</action>`.\n- Parent vision: #623.\n\n## Affected files\n- `docker/chat/server.{py,go}` — new endpoints: POST /chat/action/ci-run, POST /chat/action/issue-create, POST /chat/action/pr-create\n- `docker/chat/ui/index.html` — HTMX pattern for action buttons triggered by <action type=\"...\"> markers\n- `lib/generators.sh` — chat env: WOODPECKER_TOKEN, FORGE_TOKEN, FORGE_URL, FORGE_OWNER, FORGE_REPO"
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"action": "remove_label",
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"issue": 712,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"label": "blocked"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"action": "add_label",
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"issue": 712,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"label": "backlog"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
"action": "edit_body",
|
|
|
|
"action": "edit_body",
|
|
|
|
"issue": 707,
|
|
|
|
"issue": 713,
|
|
|
|
"body": "## Goal\n\nGive `disinto-chat` its own Claude identity mount so its OAuth refresh races cannot corrupt the factory agents' shared `~/.claude` credentials. Default to a separate `~/.claude-chat/` on the host; support `ANTHROPIC_API_KEY` as a fallback that skips OAuth entirely.\n\n## Why\n\n- #623 root-caused this: Claude Code's internal refresh lock in `~/.claude.lock` operates outside bind-mounted directories, so two containers sharing `~/.claude` can race during token refresh and invalidate each other. The factory has already had OAuth expiry incidents traced to multiple agents sharing credentials.\n- Scoping chat to its own identity dir means chat can be logged in as a different Anthropic account, or pinned to an API key, without touching agent credentials.\n\n## Scope\n\n### Files to touch\n\n- `lib/generators.sh` chat service block (from #705):\n - Replace the throwaway named volume with `${CHAT_CLAUDE_DIR:-${HOME}/.claude-chat}:/home/chat/.claude-chat`.\n - Env: `CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR=/home/chat/.claude-chat/config`, `CLAUDE_CREDENTIALS_DIR=/home/chat/.claude-chat/config/credentials`.\n - Conditional: if `ANTHROPIC_API_KEY` is set in `.env`, pass it through and **do not** mount `~/.claude-chat` at all (no credentials on disk in that mode).\n- `bin/disinto disinto_init()` — after #620's admin password prompt, add an optional prompt: `Use separate Anthropic identity for chat? (y/N)`. On yes, create `~/.claude-chat/` and invoke `claude login` in a subshell with `CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR=~/.claude-chat/config`.\n- `lib/claude-config.sh` — factor out the existing `~/.claude` setup logic so a non-default `CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR` is a first-class parameter. If it is already parameterised, just document it; if not, extract a helper `setup_claude_dir <dir>` and have the existing path call it with the default dir.\n- `docker/chat/Dockerfile` — declare `VOLUME /home/chat/.claude-chat`, set owner to the non-root chat user introduced in #706.\n\n### Out of scope\n\n- Cross-session lock coherence for multiple concurrent chat containers (single-chat-container assumption is fine for MVP).\n- Anthropic team / workspace support — single identity is enough.\n\n## Acceptance\n\n- [ ] Fresh `disinto init` with \"use separate chat identity\" answered yes creates `~/.claude-chat/` and logs in successfully.\n- [ ] With `ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=sk-ant-...` set in `.env`, chat starts without any `~/.claude-chat` mount (verified via `docker inspect disinto-chat`) and successfully completes a test prompt.\n- [ ] Running the factory agents AND chat simultaneously for 24h does not produce any OAuth refresh failures on either side (manual soak test — document result in PR).\n- [ ] `CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR` and `CLAUDE_CREDENTIALS_DIR` inside the chat container resolve to `/home/chat/.claude-chat/config*`, not the shared factory path.\n\n## Depends on\n\n- #705 (chat scaffold).\n- #620 (admin password prompt — same init flow this adds a step to).\n\n## Notes\n\n- The factory's existing shared mount is `/var/lib/disinto/claude-shared` (see `lib/generators.sh:113,327,381,426`). Chat must NOT use this path.\n- `flock(\"${HOME}/.claude/session.lock\")` logic mentioned in #623 is load-bearing, not redundant — do not \"simplify\" it.\n- Prefer the API-key path for anyone running the factory on shared hardware; call this out in README updates.\n\n## Boundaries for dev-agent\n\n- Do not try to make chat share `~/.claude` with the agents \"just for convenience\". The whole point of this chunk is the opposite.\n- Do not add a third claude config dir. One for agents, one for chat, done.\n- Do not refactor `lib/claude-config.sh` beyond extracting a parameterised helper if needed.\n- Parent vision: #623.\n\n## Affected files\n\n- `lib/generators.sh` — chat service block: replace throwaway named volume with `${CHAT_CLAUDE_DIR:-${HOME}/.claude-chat}` bind mount; add `CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR`/`CLAUDE_CREDENTIALS_DIR` env vars; skip mount when `ANTHROPIC_API_KEY` is set\n- `bin/disinto` — `disinto_init()`: add optional prompt for separate Anthropic identity for chat\n- `lib/claude-config.sh` — extract parameterized `setup_claude_dir <dir>` helper\n- `docker/chat/Dockerfile` — declare `VOLUME /home/chat/.claude-chat`, set owner to non-root chat user\n"
|
|
|
|
"body": "## Goal\n\nContingency track: if the subpath routing + Forgejo OAuth combination from #704 and #708 proves unworkable (redirect loops, Forgejo `ROOT_URL` quirks, etc.), provide a documented fallback using per-service subdomains (`forge.<project>.disinto.ai`, `ci.<project>.disinto.ai`, `chat.<project>.disinto.ai`) under the same wildcard cert.\n\n## Why\n\n- #623 Scope Highlights mentions this as the fallback if subpath OAuth fails.\n- Documenting the fallback up front means we can pivot without a days-long investigation when the subpath approach hits a wall.\n- The wildcard cert from #621 already covers `*.disinto.ai` at no extra cost.\n\n## Scope\n\nThis issue is a **plan + small toggle**, not a full implementation. Implementation only happens if #704 or #708 get stuck.\n\n### Files to touch\n\n- `docs/edge-routing-fallback.md` (new) — documents the fallback topology, diffing concretely against #704 / #708:\n - Caddyfile: four separate host blocks (`<project>.disinto.ai`, `forge.<project>...`, `ci.<project>...`, `chat.<project>...`), each a single `reverse_proxy` to the container.\n - Forgejo `ROOT_URL` becomes `https://forge.<project>.disinto.ai/` (root path, not subpath).\n - Woodpecker `WOODPECKER_HOST` becomes `https://ci.<project>.disinto.ai`.\n - OAuth redirect URIs (chat, woodpecker) become sub-subdomain paths.\n - DNS: all handled by the existing wildcard; no new records.\n- `lib/generators.sh` — no code change until pivot; document the env vars that would need to change (`EDGE_TUNNEL_FQDN_FORGE`, etc.) in a comment near `generate_compose`.\n- `tools/edge-control/register.sh` (from #621) — leave a TODO comment noting the fallback shape would need an additional subdomain parameter per project.\n\n### Out of scope (unless pivot)\n\n- Actually implementing the fallback — gated on #704 / #708 failing.\n\n## Acceptance\n\n- [ ] `docs/edge-routing-fallback.md` exists and is concrete enough that a follow-up PR to pivot would take under a day.\n- [ ] The doc names exactly which files / lines each pivot would touch (Caddyfile, `lib/generators.sh`, `lib/ci-setup.sh` redirect URI).\n- [ ] A pivot decision criterion is written into the doc: \"pivot if <specific symptom>, not if <symptom with a known fix>\".\n\n## Depends on\n\n- None — can be written in parallel to #704 / #708.\n\n## Notes\n\n- Keep the doc short. This is a pressure-release valve, not a parallel architecture.\n- Whichever chunk is implementing subpaths first should update this doc if they hit a blocker so the pivot decision is informed.\n\n## Boundaries for dev-agent\n\n- This is a documentation chunk. Do not implement the fallback unless someone explicitly says to pivot.\n- Do not make the main chunks \"fallback-ready\" — that is over-engineering for a contingency.\n- Parent vision: #623.\n\n## Affected files\n- `docs/edge-routing-fallback.md` (new) — fallback topology doc with Caddyfile, Forgejo ROOT_URL, Woodpecker HOST, OAuth redirect URI changes\n- `lib/generators.sh` — comment near generate_compose documenting env vars that change on pivot\n- `tools/edge-control/register.sh` — TODO comment noting fallback shape needs additional subdomain parameter"
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"action": "remove_label",
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"issue": 707,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"label": "blocked"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"action": "add_label",
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"issue": 707,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"label": "backlog"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
|
