fix: feat: architecture decisions section in AGENTS.md + gardener alignment checks (#479)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
382228e31a
commit
3c6723bd8f
2 changed files with 46 additions and 2 deletions
|
|
@ -101,10 +101,35 @@ Sibling dependency rule (CRITICAL):
|
|||
NEVER add bidirectional ## Dependencies between siblings (creates deadlocks).
|
||||
Use ## Related for cross-references: "## Related\n- #NNN (sibling)"
|
||||
|
||||
7. Architecture decision alignment check (AD check):
|
||||
For each open issue labeled 'backlog', check whether the issue
|
||||
contradicts any architecture decision listed in the
|
||||
## Architecture Decisions section of AGENTS.md.
|
||||
Read AGENTS.md and extract the AD table. For each backlog issue,
|
||||
compare the issue title and body against each AD. If an issue
|
||||
clearly violates an AD:
|
||||
a. Post a comment explaining the violation:
|
||||
curl -sf -X POST -H "Authorization: token $CODEBERG_TOKEN" \
|
||||
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
|
||||
"$CODEBERG_API/issues/<number>/comments" \
|
||||
-d '{"body":"Closing: violates AD-NNN (<decision summary>). See AGENTS.md § Architecture Decisions."}'
|
||||
b. Close the issue:
|
||||
curl -sf -X PATCH -H "Authorization: token $CODEBERG_TOKEN" \
|
||||
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
|
||||
"$CODEBERG_API/issues/<number>" \
|
||||
-d '{"state":"closed"}'
|
||||
c. Log to the result file:
|
||||
echo "ACTION: closed #NNN — violates AD-NNN" >> "$RESULT_FILE"
|
||||
|
||||
Only close for clear, unambiguous violations. If the issue is
|
||||
borderline or could be interpreted as compatible, leave it open
|
||||
and ESCALATE instead.
|
||||
|
||||
Processing order:
|
||||
1. Handle PRIORITY_blockers_starving_factory first — promote or resolve
|
||||
2. Process tech-debt issues by score (impact/effort)
|
||||
3. Classify remaining items as dust or escalate
|
||||
2. AD alignment check — close backlog issues that violate architecture decisions
|
||||
3. Process tech-debt issues by score (impact/effort)
|
||||
4. Classify remaining items as dust or escalate
|
||||
|
||||
Do NOT bundle dust yourself — the dust-bundling step handles accumulation,
|
||||
dedup, TTL expiry, and bundling into backlog issues.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue