fix: Resolve 'formula' terminology conflict between AGENTS.md and EVIDENCE-ARCHITECTURE.md (#228)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ae3d58f355
commit
eedb3c7045
2 changed files with 7 additions and 2 deletions
|
|
@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ Agents won't need to understand each platform. **Processes act as adapters** —
|
|||
|
||||
The planner will read `evidence/` — not Analytics, not Ponder, not DigitalOcean. Evidence is the normalized interface between the world and decisions.
|
||||
|
||||
> **Terminology note:** "Process" here means a self-contained measurement or mutation pipeline — distinct from disinto's existing "formulas" (TOML issue templates that guide the dev-agent through multi-step implementation work). Processes produce evidence; formulas produce code. Whether processes reuse the TOML formula format or need their own mechanism is an open design question.
|
||||
> **Terminology note — "process" vs "formula":** In this document, "process" means a self-contained measurement or mutation pipeline that reads an external platform and writes structured evidence to git. This is distinct from disinto's "formulas" (`formulas/*.toml`), which are TOML issue templates that guide agents through multi-step operational work (see `AGENTS.md` § Directory layout). Processes produce evidence; formulas orchestrate agent tasks.
|
||||
|
||||
## Process Types
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue