65 lines
4 KiB
Markdown
65 lines
4 KiB
Markdown
# Planner run — 2026-03-21 09:29 UTC
|
|
|
|
## Predictions triaged
|
|
- #455: DISMISS — orphaned gardener session, transient, supervisor's job
|
|
- #454: DISMISS — crashed review session, transient, supervisor recovers
|
|
- #449: DISMISS — legacy predictor duplication, already tracked by #419
|
|
- #448: WATCH — disk at 75% (was 79% last run), improving trend, supervisor monitors
|
|
- #447: DISMISS — swap at 52%, expected behavior with memory guards
|
|
- #446: WATCH — harb pipeline stalled 8h on needs_human, supervisor didn't escalate
|
|
|
|
## Issues created
|
|
- #465: feat: supervisor escalates prolonged PHASE:needs_human states — revealed by #446 pattern, prevents silent pipeline stalls
|
|
- #466: feat: example project demonstrating the full Disinto lifecycle — VISION.md Adoption gap, needed by docs and landing page
|
|
|
|
## Label fixes
|
|
- #393 (disinto init): added backlog label — was created last run but lost its label
|
|
- #394 (quickstart docs): added backlog label — same issue
|
|
- #395 (metrics dashboard): added backlog label — same issue
|
|
|
|
## Observations
|
|
- Predictor continues to over-signal on transient operational issues (4/6 predictions were transient tmux/session issues the supervisor already handles). Pattern from last run confirmed.
|
|
- Adoption issues from last planner run (#393/#394/#395) existed but had NO labels. The dev-agent only picks up backlog-labeled issues. Root cause unclear — either the label API call failed silently during creation, or labels were removed. Fixed this run.
|
|
- Foundation milestone remains complete. Adoption still the bottleneck — no progress since last run because issues weren't in the backlog.
|
|
- Tech-debt and small backlog items (~20) will be processed before Adoption features due to sequential pipeline and lower issue numbers.
|
|
- #357 (action-agent runtime isolation) is in-progress — active dev work happening.
|
|
|
|
## Deferred
|
|
- Scale milestone (multi-project works, plugin system premature without users)
|
|
- Evidence pipeline (harb-specific, blocked on #1047)
|
|
- Production halt/resume (#1) — far future, no users to protect yet
|
|
- Multi-VPS (#4) — premature, single server handles current load
|
|
- Adding backlog labels to #462 (PHASE:escalate) and #291 (secrets in formulas) — both valid but not highest leverage this cycle
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Planner run — 2026-03-21 10:05 UTC
|
|
|
|
## Predictions triaged
|
|
No unreviewed predictions.
|
|
|
|
## Issues created
|
|
No new issues — backlog is well-stocked (~30 open items) and aligned with VISION.md.
|
|
|
|
## Label fixes
|
|
- #291 (secrets in formulas): added backlog label — deferred last run, now promoted
|
|
- #289 (gardener creates investigation issues for closed escalations): added backlog label
|
|
- #462 (PHASE:escalate): added backlog label — complements #465
|
|
|
|
## Closures
|
|
- #144 (reschedule planner after predictor): closed — already implemented (predictor 06:00, planner weekly)
|
|
|
|
## Observations
|
|
- #357 (action-agent runtime isolation) COMPLETED since last run — merged via PR #464. Watch item resolved.
|
|
- #360 (no relabeling on DISMISS) also completed — merged via PR #468.
|
|
- Label persistence: #393/#394/#395 retain their backlog labels. Watch item resolved — the label loss from last run was a one-time issue.
|
|
- #361 (planner journal pattern) is in-progress — active dev work.
|
|
- Backlog queue still deep: ~20 tech-debt and small fixes sit ahead of the 4 Adoption features (#393/#394/#395/#466). Sequential pipeline means Adoption work is weeks out unless manually prioritized.
|
|
- Three previously unlabeled issues (#291, #289, #462) were invisible to the dev-agent. Now labeled as backlog. Last run deferred #291 and #462; this run is the right time to make them visible since the pipeline needs work to process.
|
|
|
|
## Deferred
|
|
- Scale milestone (plugin system, hosted option, community formulas — premature without users)
|
|
- Multi-VPS (#4) — single server handles current load
|
|
- Production halt/resume (#1) — no users to protect yet
|
|
- Self-tuning wake parameters (#2) — current static cron schedule works fine
|
|
- Memory update — only 2 runs since last summarization, threshold is 5
|